R v Martin (No 2) [2017] NSWSC 1250
The juror's inability to concentrate due to distress constitutes sufficient grounds for discharge under s 53B(d) of the Jury Act 1977 (NSW), and—given the circumstances, the consent of the accused, the nature of the juror’s discharge, and absence of any risk to justice—continuation of the trial with eleven jurors does not give rise to a substantial miscarriage of justice, permitting the trial to continue under s 53C(b).
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 06 September 2017
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal / Interlocutory Ruling During Trial
- Outcome
- Orders made discharging juror and continuing trial with eleven jurors.
- Legal Topics
- ['discharge of Juror' 'continuation of Trial With Reduced Jury' 'jury Management']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Criminal / Interlocutory Ruling During Trial
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether a juror should be discharged for inability to perform functions due to personal distress' 'Whether the trial should continue with eleven remaining jurors after discharge of one juror' 'Whether there is a risk of substantial miscarriage of justice if the trial continues with eleven jurors']
Ratio Decidendi
The juror's inability to concentrate due to distress constitutes sufficient grounds for discharge under s 53B(d) of the Jury Act 1977 (NSW), and—given the circumstances, the consent of the accused, the nature of the juror’s discharge, and absence of any risk to justice—continuation of the trial with eleven jurors does not give rise to a substantial miscarriage of justice, permitting the trial to continue under s 53C(b).
Court Disposition
Orders made discharging juror and continuing trial with eleven jurors.
Orders
- ['Order that juror 395-90 be discharged.' 'Order that the trial to continue with the remaining eleven jurors.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment