Regina v Ronen & Ors [2005] NSWSC 319
In the wholly unusual circumstances, the juror had made significant personal sacrifices after being told the trial would last three to four months but remaining empanelled for nearly nine months, and it would be intolerable and completely unreasonable to require her to continue. The absence of opposition to continuation with 10 jurors was also a proper factor to consider. The discretion under s 22 was exercised to discharge the juror.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 20 January 2005
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Proceedings / Application for Discharge of Juror During Trial
- Outcome
- Juror discharged
- Legal Topics
- ['discharge of Juror' 'continuation of Trial With Reduced Jury' 'jury Act S 22']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Criminal Proceedings / Application for Discharge of Juror During Trial
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether a juror should be discharged under s 22 of the Jury Act because overseas travel and family commitments made before empanelment had been repeatedly altered due to the unexpectedly long trial.' 'Whether the Court should take into account the likely subsequent application for the trial to continue with 10 jurors.']
Ratio Decidendi
In the wholly unusual circumstances, the juror had made significant personal sacrifices after being told the trial would last three to four months but remaining empanelled for nearly nine months, and it would be intolerable and completely unreasonable to require her to continue. The absence of opposition to continuation with 10 jurors was also a proper factor to consider. The discretion under s 22 was exercised to discharge the juror.
Court Disposition
Juror discharged
Orders
- ['I discharge the juror.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment