R v JH (No 4) [2014] NSWSC 1967
There was no risk of substantial miscarriage of justice in continuing the trial with eleven jurors where there was no evidence of contamination among the remaining jurors, and the incident was promptly and appropriately managed. Accordingly, the trial should continue with the remaining eleven jurors under s 53C of the Jury Act 1977.
- Parties
- Crown: Regina; Accused: JH
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 28 August 2014
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal / Application to Discharge Whole Jury Following Discharge of a Juror During Trial
- Outcome
- Application to discharge jury refused; trial to continue with eleven jurors
- Legal Topics
- Discharge of Jurors, Continuing Trial With Reduced Jury, Jury Act 1977 S 53 C
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Regina
Crown
JH
Accused
Procedural Posture
Criminal / Application to Discharge Whole Jury Following Discharge of a Juror During Trial
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the whole jury should be discharged following the discharge of a single juror under s 53A of the Jury Act 1977
- 2 Whether continuing the trial with eleven jurors would give rise to a risk of substantial miscarriage of justice
Ratio Decidendi
There was no risk of substantial miscarriage of justice in continuing the trial with eleven jurors where there was no evidence of contamination among the remaining jurors, and the incident was promptly and appropriately managed. Accordingly, the trial should continue with the remaining eleven jurors under s 53C of the Jury Act 1977.
Court Disposition
Application to discharge jury refused; trial to continue with eleven jurors
Orders
- Pursuant to s 53C of the Jury Act 1977, order that the trial continue with the remaining eleven jurors.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment