R v Gordon (No 7) [2017] NSWSC 195
The circumstances did not give rise to an apprehension of bias because the note did not indicate that the juror's thinking about the case had been affected, there was no reason to suppose the juror would disobey the direction not to discuss the matter with other jurors, the other jurors were not shown to have been affected, and any concern could be addressed by reinforcing directions about impartial, dispassionate and unprejudiced reasoning.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 03 March 2017
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Law / Application for Discharge of the Jury on the Basis of Apprehended Bias
- Outcome
- Application refused.
- Legal Topics
- ['discharge of Jury' 'apprehended Bias' 'jury Impartiality' 'jury Directions']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Criminal Law / Application for Discharge of the Jury on the Basis of Apprehended Bias
Legal Issues
- 1 ["Whether comments made outside the courthouse to a juror gave rise to an apprehension that the juror or jury might not bring an impartial mind to the accused's guilt or innocence." 'Whether any apprehension of bias could be addressed by further directions to the jury rather than discharging the jury.']
Ratio Decidendi
The circumstances did not give rise to an apprehension of bias because the note did not indicate that the juror's thinking about the case had been affected, there was no reason to suppose the juror would disobey the direction not to discuss the matter with other jurors, the other jurors were not shown to have been affected, and any concern could be addressed by reinforcing directions about impartial, dispassionate and unprejudiced reasoning.
Court Disposition
Application refused.
Orders
- ['Application for discharge of the jury on the basis of apprehended bias refused.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment