R v Charbaji, Azam; Charbaji, Haysem; Jamieson, Lexy May (No 5) [2016] NSWSC 1866
The display of one or two additional photographs by the deceased's family was unlikely to influence the jury given the existing evidence and previous exposure to such images; any risk could be remedied by appropriate judicial direction, so there was no sufficient basis to discharge the jury.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 20 December 2016
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal / Ruling on Application to Discharge Jury
- Outcome
- Application to discharge the jury dismissed.
- Legal Topics
- ['discharge of Jury' 'jury Trial Procedure' 'display of Photographs in Court']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Criminal / Ruling on Application to Discharge Jury
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the display of photographs of the deceased by relatives in court during summing-up requires the jury to be discharged']
Ratio Decidendi
The display of one or two additional photographs by the deceased's family was unlikely to influence the jury given the existing evidence and previous exposure to such images; any risk could be remedied by appropriate judicial direction, so there was no sufficient basis to discharge the jury.
Court Disposition
Application to discharge the jury dismissed.
Orders
- ['The application to discharge the jury is dismissed.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment