REGINA v. PARK [1999] NSWSC 1015

REGINA v. PARK [1999] NSWSC 1015

Given the introduction of crucial new evidence from a witness arriving under immunity and the resulting procedural complications, it was held inappropriate to maintain the jury for collateral purposes. The jury was discharged as both parties ultimately supported this course, and retention would serve no further trial function.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
01 October 1999
Procedural Posture
Criminal / Application to Discharge the Jury During Trial
Outcome
Application granted; jury discharged.
Legal Topics
['discharge of Jury' 'adjournment of Trial' 'evidence of Witness Under Immunity' 'basha Enquiry' 'procedural Fairness']
['criminal Law'] ['discharge of Jury' 'adjournment of Trial' 'evidence of Witness Under Immunity' 'basha Enquiry' 'procedural Fairness']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Criminal / Application to Discharge the Jury During Trial

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ['Whether the jury should be discharged after changes to key witness evidence and the impact on the fairness of the trial' 'Whether a Basha enquiry should proceed before the empanelled jury']

Ratio Decidendi

Given the introduction of crucial new evidence from a witness arriving under immunity and the resulting procedural complications, it was held inappropriate to maintain the jury for collateral purposes. The jury was discharged as both parties ultimately supported this course, and retention would serve no further trial function.

Court Disposition

Application granted; jury discharged.

Orders

  • ['Jury discharged.']