de Robillard v Council of the New South Wales Bar Association; Council of the New South Wales Bar Association v de Robillard (No 2) [2024] NSWCA 299
The Bar Council had statutory authority to institute and prosecute disciplinary proceedings and appearance rights in the Tribunal and on appeal. Mr de Robillard's challenge to standing and validity of the proceedings was rejected. The Tribunal's findings of professional misconduct were confirmed: Mr de Robillard, as counsel, made serious allegations against an opposing solicitor without reasonable foundation or belief on proper material, in contravention of key Barristers' Rules. However, the finding of unsatisfactory professional conduct regarding failure to pay a costs judgment was set aside, as there was no positive duty contravened by non-payment of a judgment debt. Notwithstanding...
- Parties
- Applicant/respondent: Christian Roger de Robillard; Respondent/applicant: Council of the New South Wales Bar Association
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 13 December 2024
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal and Originating Summons for Declaratory and Disciplinary Orders / Appellate Judgment Following Concurrent Hearing of Appeal and Summons; Review of Registrar's Orders
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed in part, otherwise dismissed; declaration made of unfitness; removal from roll ordered
- Legal Topics
- Disciplinary Proceedings Against Barristers, Removal From Roll of Practitioners, Professional Misconduct, Procedural Fairness, Standing of Bar Council, Tribunal Powers and Recommendations, Costs Orders
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Christian Roger de Robillard
Applicant/respondent
Council of the New South Wales Bar Association
Respondent/applicant
Procedural Posture
Appeal and Originating Summons for Declaratory and Disciplinary Orders / Appellate Judgment Following Concurrent Hearing of Appeal and Summons; Review of Registrar's Orders
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Council of the NSW Bar Association had standing to institute and prosecute disciplinary proceedings and defend the appeal
- 2 Whether the disciplinary application was validly filed
- 3 Whether the Tribunal committed apprehended bias or procedural unfairness
Ratio Decidendi
The Bar Council had statutory authority to institute and prosecute disciplinary proceedings and appearance rights in the Tribunal and on appeal. Mr de Robillard's challenge to standing and validity of the proceedings was rejected. The Tribunal's findings of professional misconduct were confirmed: Mr de Robillard, as counsel, made serious allegations against an opposing solicitor without reasonable foundation or belief on proper material, in contravention of key Barristers' Rules. However, the finding of unsatisfactory professional conduct regarding failure to pay a costs judgment was set aside, as there was no positive duty contravened by non-payment of a judgment debt. Notwithstanding...
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed in part, otherwise dismissed; declaration made of unfitness; removal from roll ordered
Orders
- Refuse extension of time to challenge costs order made by Registrar on 21 September 2023
- Dismiss notice of motion challenging costs order
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment