Reinsurance Australia Corporation Limited v HIH Casualty and General Insurance Ltd (in liquidation) [2003] FCA 1526
Leave to discontinue was granted as the other parties settled, the fourth respondents had no involvement, and it was appropriate not to order costs against the applicants.
- Parties
- First Applicant: Reinsurance Australia Corporation Limited; Second Applicant: Monegasque De Reassurances S.A.M.; First Respondent: HIH Casualty and General Insurance (In Liquidation); Second Respondents: AIG Europe (UK) Ltd and New Hampshire Insurance Company; Third Respondents: Heath Group Limited (formerly CE Heath plc), Heath Insurance Broking Ltd formerly C.E. Heath (Insurance Broking) Ltd and Heath North America and Special Risks Ltd; Fourth Respondents: Ice Media Limited and Premier Media Limited; Fifth Respondent: JP Morgan Chase Bank (formerly known as The Chase Manhattan Bank, formerly known as Chemical Securities Inc)
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 19 December 2003
- Procedural Posture
- Civil / Application for Leave to Discontinue Against Certain Respondents Following Settlement
- Outcome
- Leave to discontinue granted against fourth respondents with no order as to costs; proceedings otherwise to be dismissed by consent.
- Legal Topics
- Discontinuance of Proceedings, Settlement, Orders as to Costs
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Reinsurance Australia Corporation Limited
First Applicant
Monegasque De Reassurances S.A.M.
Second Applicant
HIH Casualty and General Insurance (In Liquidation)
First Respondent
AIG Europe (UK) Ltd and New Hampshire Insurance Company
Second Respondents
Heath Group Limited (formerly CE Heath plc), Heath Insurance Broking Ltd formerly C.E. Heath (Insurance Broking) Ltd and Heath North America and Special Risks Ltd
Third Respondents
Ice Media Limited and Premier Media Limited
Fourth Respondents
JP Morgan Chase Bank (formerly known as The Chase Manhattan Bank, formerly known as Chemical Securities Inc)
Fifth Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil / Application for Leave to Discontinue Against Certain Respondents Following Settlement
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the applicants should be granted leave to discontinue proceedings against the fourth respondents
- 2 Whether there should be any order as to costs against the fourth respondents
Ratio Decidendi
Leave to discontinue was granted as the other parties settled, the fourth respondents had no involvement, and it was appropriate not to order costs against the applicants.
Court Disposition
Leave to discontinue granted against fourth respondents with no order as to costs; proceedings otherwise to be dismissed by consent.
Orders
- Applicants granted leave to discontinue against the fourth respondents with no order as to costs between those parties.
- Discontinuance against the fourth respondents to take effect immediately before the dismissal of proceedings in accordance with short minutes of order signed by the applicants and other respondents.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment