State of New South Wales v Public Transport Ticketing Corporation (No 2) [2011] NSWCA 185
The identified paragraphs in [98] of the earlier reasons were to be disclosed, and because Document E41(b) was identical with documents E37(d), E40(b) and E40(c) referred to in the earlier dot point, paragraphs 3.1.1-3.1.3, 3.1.7 and 4.11-4.78 of Document E41(b) should also be disclosed.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 07 July 2011
- Procedural Posture
- Consequential Orders / On the Papers After Orders Granting Leave to Appeal and Cross Appeal and Setting Aside the Orders of the Primary Judge
- Outcome
- Paragraphs 3.1.1-3.1.3, 3.1.7 and 4.11-4.78 of Document E41(b) ordered to be disclosed on discovery.
- Legal Topics
- ['discovery' 'consequential Orders' 'disclosure of Documents']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Consequential Orders / On the Papers After Orders Granting Leave to Appeal and Cross Appeal and Setting Aside the Orders of the Primary Judge
Legal Issues
- 1 ["Whether paragraphs 3.1.1-3.1.3, 3.1.7 and 4.11-4.78 of Document E41(b) should be disclosed on discovery in clarification of the Court's earlier reasons."]
Ratio Decidendi
The identified paragraphs in [98] of the earlier reasons were to be disclosed, and because Document E41(b) was identical with documents E37(d), E40(b) and E40(c) referred to in the earlier dot point, paragraphs 3.1.1-3.1.3, 3.1.7 and 4.11-4.78 of Document E41(b) should also be disclosed.
Court Disposition
Paragraphs 3.1.1-3.1.3, 3.1.7 and 4.11-4.78 of Document E41(b) ordered to be disclosed on discovery.
Orders
- ['Paragraphs 3.1.1-3.1.3, 3.1.7 and 4.11-4.78 of Document E41(b) be disclosed on discovery.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment