Plaintiff S111A/2018 v Minister for Home Affairs [2019] FCA 1271
Discovery should be limited to categories of documents directly relevant to the issues raised by the pleadings as specified in the respondents' consented categories, and not to overly broad or speculative categories sought by the applicants.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 13 August 2019
- Procedural Posture
- Interlocutory Application for Discovery / Orders on Discovery Application
- Outcome
- Discovery orders made as per respondents' consented categories; costs reserved.
- Legal Topics
- ['discovery' 'procedural Fairness' 'visa Refusal' 'false Imprisonment' 'adverse Security Assessment']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Interlocutory Application for Discovery / Orders on Discovery Application
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether categories of documents sought are directly relevant to issues in the pleadings' 'Whether discovery facilitates the just resolution of the proceeding under Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth) r 20.11, r 20.14' 'Whether the Minister unreasonably delayed in exercising relevant functions' 'Whether detention of applicants was unlawful']
Ratio Decidendi
Discovery should be limited to categories of documents directly relevant to the issues raised by the pleadings as specified in the respondents' consented categories, and not to overly broad or speculative categories sought by the applicants.
Court Disposition
Discovery orders made as per respondents' consented categories; costs reserved.
Orders
- ['By 13 September 2019, respondents to give first tranche of discovery in annexure 1, including discovery responsive to category 4.' 'Third respondent to file and serve open affidavit supporting any public interest immunity claims for category 4 documents by 13 September 2019.' 'By 18 October 2019, respondents to...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment