Veolia Water Australia Pty Ltd v Centennial Springvale Pty Limited [2023] FCA 443

Veolia Water Australia Pty Ltd v Centennial Springvale Pty Limited [2023] FCA 443

The Court was satisfied that the applicant's evidence justified a reasonable belief that it may have a right to relief for misleading or deceptive conduct or negligent misrepresentation, that reasonable inquiries had been made, and that the documents sought were directly relevant to whether the RFI Data was representative, thus enlivening and warranting the exercise of the Court's discretion to order preliminary discovery.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
10 May 2023
Procedural Posture
Application for Preliminary Discovery / Judgment and Orders on Preliminary Discovery Application
Outcome
Application for preliminary discovery granted
Legal Topics
['discovery' 'preliminary Discovery' 'misleading or Deceptive Conduct' 'negligent Misrepresentation' 'contractual Disputes']
['practice and Procedure' 'commercial Law'] ['discovery' 'preliminary Discovery' 'misleading or Deceptive Conduct' 'negligent Misrepresentation' 'contractual Disputes']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Application for Preliminary Discovery / Judgment and Orders on Preliminary Discovery Application

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ['Whether the requirements for preliminary discovery under r 7.23 of the Federal Court Rules 2011 were met' 'Whether reasonable cause exists to believe the applicant may have a right to relief for misleading or deceptive conduct or negligent misrepresentation' 'Whether the scope of documents sought is directly relevant']

Ratio Decidendi

The Court was satisfied that the applicant's evidence justified a reasonable belief that it may have a right to relief for misleading or deceptive conduct or negligent misrepresentation, that reasonable inquiries had been made, and that the documents sought were directly relevant to whether the RFI Data was representative, thus enlivening and warranting the exercise of the Court's discretion to order preliminary discovery.

Court Disposition

Application for preliminary discovery granted

Orders

  • ['The respondents to give discovery to the applicant of raw, analysed, analytical and processed data of samples/tests of Mine Water and Bore Holes from Springvale and Angus Place mines for the period 1 October 2014 to 12 November 2017.' 'Discovery to be provided by 31 May 2023.' 'Parties to confer on costs and...