Power Infrastructure Pty Limited v Downer EDI Engineering Power Pty Limited (No. 4) [2012] FCA 143

Power Infrastructure Pty Limited v Downer EDI Engineering Power Pty Limited (No. 4) [2012] FCA 143

The orders for discovery must be confined to those categories or subcategories of documents which are directly relevant to a matter in issue in the proceeding as identified in the pleadings, proportionate to the benefit in resolving those issues, and consistent with the overarching purpose of civil practice and procedure. Consequently, discovery was allowed only in respect of certain reformulated or narrower categories, and refused where the requests were overly broad, insufficiently relevant, or would impose disproportionate cost or burden.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
28 February 2012
Procedural Posture
Interlocutory Application in Civil Proceedings / Discovery Dispute—interlocutory Determination
Outcome
Interlocutory orders on application for discovery—application granted in part and refused in part; parties to bring in short minutes of order; costs reserved.
Legal Topics
['discovery' 'standard Discovery' 'federal Court Procedure']
['civil Procedure'] ['discovery' 'standard Discovery' 'federal Court Procedure']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Interlocutory Application in Civil Proceedings / Discovery Dispute—interlocutory Determination

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ['Whether certain categories of documents sought in discovery are directly relevant to the issues in the pleadings' 'The proper application of standard discovery under r 20.14 Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth)' 'Whether requests for discovery are proportionate and in accordance with the overarching purpose under s 37M Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth)']

Ratio Decidendi

The orders for discovery must be confined to those categories or subcategories of documents which are directly relevant to a matter in issue in the proceeding as identified in the pleadings, proportionate to the benefit in resolving those issues, and consistent with the overarching purpose of civil practice and procedure. Consequently, discovery was allowed only in respect of certain reformulated or narrower categories, and refused where the requests were overly broad, insufficiently relevant, or would impose disproportionate cost or burden.

Court Disposition

Interlocutory orders on application for discovery—application granted in part and refused in part; parties to bring in short minutes of order; costs reserved.

Orders

  • ['The parties bring in short minutes giving effect to these reasons within 7 days.' 'Costs of the interlocutory application filed on 29 August 2011 be reserved.']