Armstrong Strategic Management and Marketing v Expense Reduction Analysis Group [2013] NSWSC 1702
Given the magnitude of non-compliance and the existing obligation from the prior order, the individual defendants must provide further informal discovery of documents before serving their evidence, regardless of Practice Note SC Eq 11.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 15 November 2013
- Procedural Posture
- Procedural Ruling / Interlocutory Discovery and Directions
- Outcome
- Order for further informal discovery and directions for evidence. Costs reserved.
- Legal Topics
- ['discovery' 'case Management' 'practice Directions']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Procedural Ruling / Interlocutory Discovery and Directions
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether individual defendants are obliged to provide further discovery of documents found after original discovery orders and after commencement of Practice Note SC Eq 11' 'Whether further discovery should precede service of evidence or vice versa']
Ratio Decidendi
Given the magnitude of non-compliance and the existing obligation from the prior order, the individual defendants must provide further informal discovery of documents before serving their evidence, regardless of Practice Note SC Eq 11.
Court Disposition
Order for further informal discovery and directions for evidence. Costs reserved.
Orders
- ['First, third, fourth, fifth, sixth, seventh, eighth, ninth, and tenth defendants to give further informal discovery of documents by 3 February 2014.' 'Reservation of whether those defendants should be required to verify further discovery.' 'Those defendants to serve lay evidence by 11 April 2014 and expert...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment