National Australia Bank Ltd & Ors v Idoport Pty Ltd & Anor [2000] NSWCA 8
The trial judge did not apply the erroneous 'train of inquiry' test; he applied the correct test per the current NSW Supreme Court Rules, limiting discovery to documents rationally affecting the proof of facts in issue. The orders were responsive to the parties’ arguments and not oppressive, and no error in principle or sufficiently arguable ground for leave to appeal was established.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 15 February 2000
- Procedural Posture
- Application for Leave to Appeal / Determination of Application for Leave to Appeal From Discovery Orders
- Outcome
- Application dismissed with costs.
- Legal Topics
- ['discovery' 'relevance of Documents in Discovery' 'interlocutory Applications']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Application for Leave to Appeal / Determination of Application for Leave to Appeal From Discovery Orders
Legal Issues
- 1 ["Did the trial judge apply an incorrect legal test by using the 'train of inquiry' test for relevance in making discovery orders?" 'Were the discovery orders oppressive or unduly wide?']
Ratio Decidendi
The trial judge did not apply the erroneous 'train of inquiry' test; he applied the correct test per the current NSW Supreme Court Rules, limiting discovery to documents rationally affecting the proof of facts in issue. The orders were responsive to the parties’ arguments and not oppressive, and no error in principle or sufficiently arguable ground for leave to appeal was established.
Court Disposition
Application dismissed with costs.
Orders
- ['Application for leave to appeal dismissed with costs.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment