Zhu v Yingle Culture Exchange (Australia) Pty Ltd ACN 113 089 759 (In Liquidation) [2010] NSWSC 107

Zhu v Yingle Culture Exchange (Australia) Pty Ltd ACN 113 089 759 (In Liquidation) [2010] NSWSC 107

Discovery is ordered for categories of documents that could rationally affect the assessment of the probability of facts in issue, subject to temporal limitations aligned with the period between Yingle's incorporation and liquidation, with further limitation for certain categories relevant to the timeframe of alleged representations.

Parties
First Plaintiff: Yi Lin Zhu; Second Plaintiff: Lei Jiang; First Defendant: Yingle Culture Exchange (Australia) Pty Ltd ACN 113 089 759 (In Liquidation); Second Defendant: Qin Fen Dai; Third Defendant: Carter Bai
Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
26 February 2010
Procedural Posture
Civil / Interlocutory (discovery Application)
Outcome
Discovery granted in part; discovery refused in relation to Category 2(i); temporal limits imposed.
Legal Topics
Discovery, Misleading or Deceptive Conduct, Relevance of Documents, Trade Practices, Directors' Duties
Practice and Procedure Corporate Law Consumer Law Discovery Misleading or Deceptive Conduct Relevance of Documents Trade Practices Directors' Duties

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 5 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Yi Lin Zhu

First Plaintiff

Lei Jiang

Second Plaintiff

Yingle Culture Exchange (Australia) Pty Ltd ACN 113 089 759 (In Liquidation)

First Defendant

Qin Fen Dai

Second Defendant

Carter Bai

Third Defendant

Procedural Posture

Civil / Interlocutory (discovery Application)

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the categories of documents sought for discovery are relevant to the issues in dispute
  2. 2 Relevance of certain categories to claims of misleading or deceptive conduct
  3. 3 Appropriate periods for discovery

Ratio Decidendi

Discovery is ordered for categories of documents that could rationally affect the assessment of the probability of facts in issue, subject to temporal limitations aligned with the period between Yingle's incorporation and liquidation, with further limitation for certain categories relevant to the timeframe of alleged representations.

Court Disposition

Discovery granted in part; discovery refused in relation to Category 2(i); temporal limits imposed.

Orders

  • The plaintiffs shall file and serve, within seven days, a short minute of order reflecting the foregoing reasons for judgment.
  • The second and third defendants shall notify the Court, by email, of any objection to the form of order, within two days thereafter.