Redline Contracting Pty Ltd v MCC Mining (Western Australia) Pty Ltd [2012] FCA 1157
The Court found the reply filed by MCC Mining was inadequate and failed to comply with the Act, Rules, and Practice Direction regarding identification of pleaded issues. Discovery ordered on 20 June 2012 was standard discovery under r 20.14 of the Rules and did not require the Peruvian Guano test.
- Parties
- Applicant; Cross Respondent: Redline Contracting Pty Ltd; Respondent; Cross Claimant: MCC Mining (Western Australia) Pty Ltd
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 15 October 2012
- Procedural Posture
- Interlocutory Application / Programming Orders; Directions Hearing
- Outcome
- Programming and procedural orders; strike out of reply; scope of discovery clarified.
- Legal Topics
- Discovery, Pleadings, Programming Orders
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Redline Contracting Pty Ltd
Applicant; Cross Respondent
MCC Mining (Western Australia) Pty Ltd
Respondent; Cross Claimant
Procedural Posture
Interlocutory Application / Programming Orders; Directions Hearing
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether an order for 'general discovery' required the parties to give discovery in accordance with the Peruvian Guano test
- 2 Adequacy of the reply filed by the respondent to the defence to cross-claim
Ratio Decidendi
The Court found the reply filed by MCC Mining was inadequate and failed to comply with the Act, Rules, and Practice Direction regarding identification of pleaded issues. Discovery ordered on 20 June 2012 was standard discovery under r 20.14 of the Rules and did not require the Peruvian Guano test.
Court Disposition
Programming and procedural orders; strike out of reply; scope of discovery clarified.
Orders
- The respondent to file and serve its amended defence (if any) and amended notice of cross-claim by 31 October 2012.
- Applicant to file and serve its amended defence to amended notice of cross-claim by 14 November 2012.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment