Chris (Krste) Saravinovski v George Saravinovski [2014] NSWSC 1282
The proposed interrogatories are not necessary at the present time to determine the liability issues in the cross-claim; necessity is to be determined in light of pleadings and relief sought. Many of the issues raised by interrogatories are only relevant to an accounting, should liability be found. Rule 22.1(4) precludes an order being made for interrogatories now.
- Parties
- Plaintiff/cross Defendant: Chris (Krste) Saravinovski; Defendant/cross Claimant: George Saravinovski
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 17 September 2014
- Procedural Posture
- Notice of Motion / Application for Order That Cross Defendant Answer Interrogatories
- Outcome
- Notice of Motion dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Discovery and Interrogatories, Necessity for Interrogatories, Case Management
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Chris (Krste) Saravinovski
Plaintiff/cross Defendant
George Saravinovski
Defendant/cross Claimant
Procedural Posture
Notice of Motion / Application for Order That Cross Defendant Answer Interrogatories
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether an order for interrogatories is 'necessary' at the present stage of proceedings under UCPR Pt 22, Rule 22.1(4)
Ratio Decidendi
The proposed interrogatories are not necessary at the present time to determine the liability issues in the cross-claim; necessity is to be determined in light of pleadings and relief sought. Many of the issues raised by interrogatories are only relevant to an accounting, should liability be found. Rule 22.1(4) precludes an order being made for interrogatories now.
Court Disposition
Notice of Motion dismissed
Orders
- George’s notice of motion is dismissed.
- George to pay Chris’ costs of today.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment