Johnson on behalf of the Barkandji (Paakantyi) People v Minister for Land and Water Conservation for the State of New South Wales [2003] FCA 1411
The application was dismissed because, despite court orders and opportunities given, the applicants failed to appoint a legal representative or agree to a mediation program, and no meaningful progress had occurred in over five years, rendering further litigation an abuse of process.
- Parties
- Applicants: Noel Johnson & Ors; Respondents: Minister for Land and Water Conservation for the State of New South Wales & Ors; Interested Party: New South Wales Native Title Services Limited; Interested Party: New South Wales Farmers Association; Interested Party: Wentworth Shire Council
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 02 December 2003
- Procedural Posture
- Native Title Application / Application for Dismissal After Failure to Comply With Court Orders Regarding Mediation and Legal Representation
- Outcome
- Application dismissed as an abuse of process under O 20 r 2(1)(c) of the Federal Court Rules.
- Legal Topics
- Dismissal for Failure to Comply With Orders, Abuse of Process, Legal Representation Requirements, Mediation and Negotiation in Native Title Proceedings
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Noel Johnson & Ors
Applicants
Minister for Land and Water Conservation for the State of New South Wales & Ors
Respondents
New South Wales Native Title Services Limited
Interested Party
New South Wales Farmers Association
Interested Party
Wentworth Shire Council
Interested Party
Procedural Posture
Native Title Application / Application for Dismissal After Failure to Comply With Court Orders Regarding Mediation and Legal Representation
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the application should be dismissed for failure to comply with orders regarding appointment of legal representative and negotiation/mediation program
- 2 Whether continued proceedings constitute an abuse of process
Ratio Decidendi
The application was dismissed because, despite court orders and opportunities given, the applicants failed to appoint a legal representative or agree to a mediation program, and no meaningful progress had occurred in over five years, rendering further litigation an abuse of process.
Court Disposition
Application dismissed as an abuse of process under O 20 r 2(1)(c) of the Federal Court Rules.
Orders
- The application be dismissed pursuant to Order 20 rule 2 of the Federal Court Rules.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment