Templar v Watt (No 2) [2015] NSWSC 997
Although the further delay was serious and the defendants' application was warranted, the principal recent delay was caused by the plaintiffs' legal representatives' failure to carry out simple administrative tasks rather than by the plaintiffs personally. Because dismissal would be a draconian sanction, an order short of dismissal, with strict conditional consequences for any further breach, was appropriate.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 26 June 2015
- Procedural Posture
- Application to Have Proceedings Dismissed for Want of Due Despatch / Ex Tempore Ruling
- Outcome
- Application to have proceedings dismissed for want of due despatch dismissed.
- Legal Topics
- ['dismissal for Want of Due Despatch' 'delay' 'mediation Directions' 'conditional Dismissal' 'costs Reserved']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Application to Have Proceedings Dismissed for Want of Due Despatch / Ex Tempore Ruling
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the proceedings should be dismissed for want of due despatch because of further delay after an earlier warning.' "Whether the recent delay should be visited on the plaintiffs personally where it was caused by their legal representatives' failure to attend to administrative steps." 'Whether costs of the present application should be paid by the plaintiffs forthwith or reserved.']
Ratio Decidendi
Although the further delay was serious and the defendants' application was warranted, the principal recent delay was caused by the plaintiffs' legal representatives' failure to carry out simple administrative tasks rather than by the plaintiffs personally. Because dismissal would be a draconian sanction, an order short of dismissal, with strict conditional consequences for any further breach, was appropriate.
Court Disposition
Application to have proceedings dismissed for want of due despatch dismissed.
Orders
- ['The expert report be served by close of business today.' "Within seven days of today the plaintiffs' legal representatives in co-operation with Mr Cantrell approach the list clerk and obtain a date for further mediation and a date for hearing." 'In the event of any breach on the part of the plaintiffs of either...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment