Qantas Airways Ltd v Australian Licensed Aircraft Engineers Association (No 2) [2020] FCA 951
Both the Qantas and Jetstar Enterprise Agreements require certain steps of dispute resolution before referral to the Fair Work Commission. The Court finds that substantial compliance with these steps occurred, and so the Commission has jurisdiction to deal with the dispute, but only to the extent of whether LAMEs could be 'usefully employed'—not broader issues such as 'stoppage of work' or causation.
- Parties
- First Applicant: Qantas Airways Ltd; Second Applicant: Jetstar Airways Pty Ltd; First Respondent: Australian Licensed Aircraft Engineers Association; Second Respondent: Fair Work Commission
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 09 July 2020
- Procedural Posture
- Application for Judicial Review / Declaration / Final Judgment
- Outcome
- Application allowed in part; orders to be finalized
- Legal Topics
- Dispute Resolution Procedures in Enterprise Agreements, Jurisdiction of Fair Work Commission, Construction of Enterprise Agreements
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Qantas Airways Ltd
First Applicant
Jetstar Airways Pty Ltd
Second Applicant
Australian Licensed Aircraft Engineers Association
First Respondent
Fair Work Commission
Second Respondent
Procedural Posture
Application for Judicial Review / Declaration / Final Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether compliance with each stage of dispute resolution procedures is mandatory under the Qantas and Jetstar Enterprise Agreements
- 2 Whether the Fair Work Commission has jurisdiction to deal with the Engineers Association's applications
- 3 What is the proper construction of the relevant enterprise agreement clauses
Ratio Decidendi
Both the Qantas and Jetstar Enterprise Agreements require certain steps of dispute resolution before referral to the Fair Work Commission. The Court finds that substantial compliance with these steps occurred, and so the Commission has jurisdiction to deal with the dispute, but only to the extent of whether LAMEs could be 'usefully employed'—not broader issues such as 'stoppage of work' or causation.
Court Disposition
Application allowed in part; orders to be finalized
Orders
- The parties are to bring in Short Minutes of Orders to give effect to these reasons within seven days.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment