Buttigieg v Buttigieg [2002] NSWSC 738

Buttigieg v Buttigieg [2002] NSWSC 738

After dissolution on 1 August 1998, Emanuel continued to carry on the market gardening business using partnership assets, including the land, plant and equipment, until 30 June 2000 and there had been no final settlement of accounts. Those facts satisfied section 42(1) of the Partnership Act 1892, giving Frank a statutory entitlement, at his option, to interest at 6 per cent per annum on his $193,000 share of the partnership assets for the period 1 August 1998 to 30 June 2000. The entitlement did not extend beyond 30 June 2000 because Emanuel then ceased carrying on the business.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
23 August 2002
Procedural Posture
Equity Division Proceedings Concerning Co Owned Land and a Partnership Cross Claim / Hearing of the Defendant/cross Claimant's Claim for Statutory Interest Under Section 42(1) of the Partnership Act 1892
Outcome
Defendant/Cross-claimant Frank Buttigieg succeeded on the claim for statutory interest, but only for the period from 1 August 1998 to 30 June 2000.
Legal Topics
['dissolution of Partnership' "outgoing Partner's Entitlement to Profits or Interest" 'use of Partnership Assets After Dissolution' 'co Ownership of Land' 'statutory Interest']
['partnership Law' 'equity' 'property Law'] ['dissolution of Partnership' "outgoing Partner's Entitlement to Profits or Interest" 'use of Partnership Assets After Dissolution' 'co Ownership of Land' 'statutory Interest']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Equity Division Proceedings Concerning Co Owned Land and a Partnership Cross Claim / Hearing of the Defendant/cross Claimant's Claim for Statutory Interest Under Section 42(1) of the Partnership Act 1892

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ['Whether Emanuel carried on the business of the former partnership with its capital or assets without final settlement of accounts so as to attract section 42(1) of the Partnership Act 1892.' 'Whether Frank was entitled to interest at 6 per cent per annum rather than a share of profits.' 'Whether the period for statutory interest continued after Emanuel ceased market gardening operations on 30 June 2000.' 'Whether section 42(1) required use of the entirety of the partnership assets by the continuing former partner.']

Ratio Decidendi

After dissolution on 1 August 1998, Emanuel continued to carry on the market gardening business using partnership assets, including the land, plant and equipment, until 30 June 2000 and there had been no final settlement of accounts. Those facts satisfied section 42(1) of the Partnership Act 1892, giving Frank a statutory entitlement, at his option, to interest at 6 per cent per annum on his $193,000 share of the partnership assets for the period 1 August 1998 to 30 June 2000. The entitlement did not extend beyond 30 June 2000 because Emanuel then ceased carrying on the business.

Court Disposition

Defendant/Cross-claimant Frank Buttigieg succeeded on the claim for statutory interest, but only for the period from 1 August 1998 to 30 June 2000.

Orders

  • ['The Plaintiff pay to the Defendant, by way of interest pursuant to section 42(1) of the Partnership Act 1890, the sum of $22,195, and there be judgment for the Defendant in that sum.' 'The Plaintiff pay the costs of the Defendant of the hearing in respect to the foregoing claim of the Defendant.' "The balance of...