Singh v Singh (No 2) [2024] NSWSC 1269
Given the parties’ history and breakdown, it was appropriate to depart from the usual partnership costs rule. Defendants to pay plaintiffs' costs, including Cross Summons, except plaintiffs to pay defendants' costs for unsuccessful buyout claim. Costs of winding up partnership to be paid out of partnership assets. Indemnity costs not warranted; costs payable on the ordinary basis.
- Parties
- First Plaintiff/first Cross Defendant: Labh Singh; Second Plaintiff/second Cross Defendant: Baljeet Singh; Third Plaintiff/fourth Cross Defendant: Jaswant Singh; Fourth Plaintiff/third Cross Defendant: Rajvinder Kaur Singh; Fifth Plaintiff/fifth Cross Defendant: Jasvir Kaur Tiwana; Sixth Plaintiff/sixth Cross Defendant: Manjit Singh Tiwana; Seventh Plaintiff/seventh Cross Defendant: Estate of the Late Manjit Kaur Singh; Eighth Plaintiff/eighth Cross Defendant: Paramjit Singh; First Defendant/first Cross Claimant: Rashpal Kaur Singh; Second Defendant/second Cross Claimant: Phoola Singh
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 10 October 2024
- Procedural Posture
- Equity Proceedings / Post Judgment: Costs Determination
- Outcome
- Costs orders made: defendants to pay plaintiffs' costs (with exceptions); plaintiffs to pay costs of buyout claim; winding-up costs from partnership assets.
- Legal Topics
- Dissolution of Partnership, Costs Order, Calderbank Offer
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Labh Singh
First Plaintiff/first Cross Defendant
Baljeet Singh
Second Plaintiff/second Cross Defendant
Jaswant Singh
Third Plaintiff/fourth Cross Defendant
Rajvinder Kaur Singh
Fourth Plaintiff/third Cross Defendant
Jasvir Kaur Tiwana
Fifth Plaintiff/fifth Cross Defendant
Manjit Singh Tiwana
Sixth Plaintiff/sixth Cross Defendant
Estate of the Late Manjit Kaur Singh
Seventh Plaintiff/seventh Cross Defendant
Paramjit Singh
Eighth Plaintiff/eighth Cross Defendant
Rashpal Kaur Singh
First Defendant/first Cross Claimant
Phoola Singh
Second Defendant/second Cross Claimant
Procedural Posture
Equity Proceedings / Post Judgment: Costs Determination
Legal Issues
- 1 Appropriate costs order upon dissolution of partnership
- 2 Departure from usual rule for costs in partnership dissolution
- 3 Effect of offers and party conduct on costs
Ratio Decidendi
Given the parties’ history and breakdown, it was appropriate to depart from the usual partnership costs rule. Defendants to pay plaintiffs' costs, including Cross Summons, except plaintiffs to pay defendants' costs for unsuccessful buyout claim. Costs of winding up partnership to be paid out of partnership assets. Indemnity costs not warranted; costs payable on the ordinary basis.
Court Disposition
Costs orders made: defendants to pay plaintiffs' costs (with exceptions); plaintiffs to pay costs of buyout claim; winding-up costs from partnership assets.
Orders
- Subject to order 2, the defendants to pay the plaintiffs' costs of the proceedings to date including the costs of the Cross Summons.
- The plaintiffs to pay the defendants' costs of the plaintiffs' claim for a buyout order as set out in prayers 3A to 3E of the Amended Summons, which include the costs of the hearing on 29 July 2024.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment