Tilney v Tilney [1968] HCA 32
Special leave was refused because s. 28 (d) plainly required habitual cruelty to have endured for not less than a year, whereas Lucas J found habitual cruelty for only some seven months at most, so the petition was correctly dismissed and the Full Court was correct to affirm that construction.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Procedural Posture
- Application for Special Leave to Appeal in a Divorce Case / High Court Application for Special Leave to Appeal From an Order of the Full Court of the Supreme Court of Queensland Affirming Lucas J
- Outcome
- Application for special leave refused.
- Legal Topics
- ['divorce' 'matrimonial Causes' 'cruelty' 'statutory Interpretation' 'special Leave to Appeal']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Application for Special Leave to Appeal in a Divorce Case / High Court Application for Special Leave to Appeal From an Order of the Full Court of the Supreme Court of Queensland Affirming Lucas J
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the word "during" in s. 28 (d) of the Matrimonial Causes Act 1959-1966 Cth meant "in the course of" rather than requiring habitual cruelty to persist throughout a period of not less than one year.' 'Whether special leave should be granted to challenge the construction of s. 28 (d) adopted by Lucas J and the Full Court of the Supreme Court of Queensland.']
Ratio Decidendi
Special leave was refused because s. 28 (d) plainly required habitual cruelty to have endured for not less than a year, whereas Lucas J found habitual cruelty for only some seven months at most, so the petition was correctly dismissed and the Full Court was correct to affirm that construction.
Court Disposition
Application for special leave refused.
Orders
- ['Application for special leave refused.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment