R v Kitanovski [2022] NSWDC 600
The offender knowingly took multiple planned steps to assist Mostafa Baluch, who was wanted in relation to alleged drug importation, to avoid the course of justice, including collecting him, providing a vehicle, placing the vehicle in a container, loading the container onto a truck, and driving it toward Queensland using a false job docket. The offending was in the lower end of the mid-range of objective seriousness. Imprisonment was the only appropriate sentence, but the offender's guilty plea, good character, minimal criminal history, negligible risk of reoffending, strong rehabilitation prospects, family hardship, and onerous custody during COVID-19 justified a 22 month sentence after...
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 26 October 2022
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Sentencing for Offence Under Section 43(1) of the Crimes Act 1914 (ct H) / Sentence After Guilty Plea
- Outcome
- Offender convicted and sentenced to 22 months imprisonment, with 12 months allowed as already spent in custody and the remaining 10 months to be served by intensive correction order.
- Legal Topics
- ['do an Act With Intent to Pervert Course of Justice' 'attempt to Obstruct, Prevent, Pervert or Defeat the Course of Justice of the Commonwealth' 'objective Seriousness' 'guilty Plea Discount' 'intensive Correction Order' 'general Deterrence' 'family Hardship' 'onerous Custody During COVID 19']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Criminal Sentencing for Offence Under Section 43(1) of the Crimes Act 1914 (ct H) / Sentence After Guilty Plea
Legal Issues
- 1 ['What sentence should be imposed for attempting to obstruct, prevent, pervert or defeat the course of justice of the Commonwealth by assisting Mostafa Baluch to flee New South Wales and evade criminal proceedings.' "Whether the offending fell within the mid-range of objective seriousness and how the offender's planning, knowledge and role affected sentence." 'Whether the offender should receive a 25% or greater discount for the guilty plea.' "Whether time already served in custody and the offender's subjective circumstances justified the balance of the sentence being served by intensive correction order."]
Ratio Decidendi
The offender knowingly took multiple planned steps to assist Mostafa Baluch, who was wanted in relation to alleged drug importation, to avoid the course of justice, including collecting him, providing a vehicle, placing the vehicle in a container, loading the container onto a truck, and driving it toward Queensland using a false job docket. The offending was in the lower end of the mid-range of objective seriousness. Imprisonment was the only appropriate sentence, but the offender's guilty plea, good character, minimal criminal history, negligible risk of reoffending, strong rehabilitation prospects, family hardship, and onerous custody during COVID-19 justified a 22 month sentence after...
Court Disposition
Offender convicted and sentenced to 22 months imprisonment, with 12 months allowed as already spent in custody and the remaining 10 months to be served by intensive correction order.
Orders
- ['Of the offence under section 43 of the Commonwealth Crimes Act the offender is convicted.' 'The offender is sentenced to a term of imprisonment, after allowing a 25% discount and rounding it down, to 22 months. Taking into account the 12 months allowed as already spent in custody the term will be 10 months to be...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment