Kelly v Thorn; Monteleone v Thorn (No 7) [2021] NSWSC 117
Mr Kelly's credibility was in issue and the challenged statement was a prior consistent statement made shortly after the accident. It was admissible under s 108(3) of the Evidence Act 1995 (NSW). The statement was also sufficiently contemporaneous with the accident on Mr Kelly's property to be admissible as part of the res gestae and as evidence that Mr Kelly observed the deck drop on the plaintiff's arm.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 19 February 2021
- Procedural Posture
- Procedural Ruling / Tender of Statement and Objection to Admissibility
- Outcome
- The statement of Dr Amy Kelly dated 19 November 2020 is admitted.
- Legal Topics
- ['documentary Evidence' 'tender of Documents' 'admissibility' 'late Service' 'res Gestae' 'credibility' 'prior Consistent Statement']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Procedural Ruling / Tender of Statement and Objection to Admissibility
Legal Issues
- 1 ["Whether the identified part of the statement of Dr Amy Kelly dated 19 November 2020 was admissible despite the defendant's objection." 'Whether the statement was admissible as part of the res gestae.' 'Whether the statement was admissible as impacting upon the credibility of Andrew Kelly under s 108(3) of the Evidence Act 1995 (NSW).']
Ratio Decidendi
Mr Kelly's credibility was in issue and the challenged statement was a prior consistent statement made shortly after the accident. It was admissible under s 108(3) of the Evidence Act 1995 (NSW). The statement was also sufficiently contemporaneous with the accident on Mr Kelly's property to be admissible as part of the res gestae and as evidence that Mr Kelly observed the deck drop on the plaintiff's arm.
Court Disposition
The statement of Dr Amy Kelly dated 19 November 2020 is admitted.
Orders
- ['The statement of Dr Amy Kelly dated 19 November 2020 is admitted.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment