R v HG [2018] NSWSC 1849
The offender's conduct was at about the mid-range of objective seriousness because he had deliberately sourced Islamic State propaganda advocating knife attacks, acquired and concealed fixed-blade and partially serrated knives, carried clothing and items capable of disguise, took steps to avoid being traced, possessed a pledge of allegiance note, and was near a police station and court house where he regarded government-connected persons as evil. A terrorist act involving knife-inflicted harm was imminent. Although the offender was 16 years and 5 months old and had no criminal history, his conduct was planned, adult-like and serious, and general deterrence, denunciation and community...
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 11 December 2018
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Sentence for Doing Acts in Preparation For, or Planning, a Terrorist Act or Acts / Sentence After Jury Verdict of Guilty
- Outcome
- Offender convicted and sentenced to imprisonment for 16 years with a non-parole period of 12 years.
- Legal Topics
- ['doing Acts in Preparation for, Or Planning, A Terrorist Act or Acts' 'objective Seriousness' 'extremist Ideology' 'general Deterrence' 'community Protection' 'youth as a Sentencing Factor' 'rehabilitation' 'non Parole Period' 'juvenile Offender Order']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Criminal Sentence for Doing Acts in Preparation For, or Planning, a Terrorist Act or Acts / Sentence After Jury Verdict of Guilty
Legal Issues
- 1 ['What sentence should be imposed for the offence of doing acts in preparation for, or planning, a terrorist act or acts.' 'Whether the offending was objectively serious and whether the commission of a terrorist act was imminent at the time of arrest.' "The extent to which the offender's youth mitigated sentence in light of the seriousness of the offending and adult-like behaviour." 'Whether the offender had shown contrition, renounced extremist views, and had prospects of rehabilitation.' 'Whether the sentence should be served as a juvenile offender up to the offender attaining 21 years of age.']
Ratio Decidendi
The offender's conduct was at about the mid-range of objective seriousness because he had deliberately sourced Islamic State propaganda advocating knife attacks, acquired and concealed fixed-blade and partially serrated knives, carried clothing and items capable of disguise, took steps to avoid being traced, possessed a pledge of allegiance note, and was near a police station and court house where he regarded government-connected persons as evil. A terrorist act involving knife-inflicted harm was imminent. Although the offender was 16 years and 5 months old and had no criminal history, his conduct was planned, adult-like and serious, and general deterrence, denunciation and community...
Court Disposition
Offender convicted and sentenced to imprisonment for 16 years with a non-parole period of 12 years.
Orders
- ['The offender is convicted of the offence of doing acts in preparation for, or planning, a terrorist act or acts.' 'The offender is sentenced to imprisonment for 16 years commencing on 12 October 2016 and expiring on 11 October 2032.' 'A non-parole period of 12 years imprisonment is specified commencing on 12...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment