R v Saunders [2021] NSWDC 530
The objective seriousness of Count 1, including the domestic violence context, the choking until unconsciousness and the Form 1 offending, required imprisonment, and Count 4 also required imprisonment. Although the offender was remorseful, had good rehabilitation prospects, was unlikely to reoffend and had health issues, only full-time custody could properly address punishment, denunciation, general deterrence and recognition of the harm done to the victim. Counts 3 and 5 did not cross the custodial threshold and were appropriately dealt with by community correction orders. Special circumstances were established because it was the offender's first time in custody, justifying a reduced...
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 12 May 2021
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Sentencing / Sentence Following Guilty Plea
- Outcome
- Aggregate sentence of 3 years imprisonment with a non-parole period of 1 year and 6 months for Counts 1 and 4, and community correction orders for Counts 3 and 5.
- Legal Topics
- ['domestic Violence' 'intentionally Choking and Rendering Unconscious' 'assault Occasioning Actual Bodily Harm' 'intimidation With Intent to Cause Fear of Physical or Mental Harm' 'remorse' 'general Deterrence' 'specific Deterrence' 'hardship to Third Parties' 'health Issues' 'special Circumstances' 'aggregate Sentence']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Criminal Sentencing / Sentence Following Guilty Plea
Legal Issues
- 1 ["What sentences should be imposed for the offender's domestic violence offences after his guilty plea." 'Whether imprisonment was the only appropriate penalty for Counts 1 and 4.' 'Whether Counts 3 and 5 crossed the custodial threshold.' 'Whether an intensive correction order was appropriate for the aggregate sentence.' 'Whether special circumstances justified varying the ratio between the non-parole period and the parole period.' "Whether hardship to third parties and the offender's medical conditions mitigated sentence."]
Ratio Decidendi
The objective seriousness of Count 1, including the domestic violence context, the choking until unconsciousness and the Form 1 offending, required imprisonment, and Count 4 also required imprisonment. Although the offender was remorseful, had good rehabilitation prospects, was unlikely to reoffend and had health issues, only full-time custody could properly address punishment, denunciation, general deterrence and recognition of the harm done to the victim. Counts 3 and 5 did not cross the custodial threshold and were appropriately dealt with by community correction orders. Special circumstances were established because it was the offender's first time in custody, justifying a reduced...
Court Disposition
Aggregate sentence of 3 years imprisonment with a non-parole period of 1 year and 6 months for Counts 1 and 4, and community correction orders for Counts 3 and 5.
Orders
- ['In relation to Counts 1 and 4 on the indictment, the offender is convicted.' 'Taking into account the Form 1 offences, the offender is sentenced to a total aggregate sentence of 3 years imprisonment to date from 11 May 2021 and expire on 10 May 2024.' 'A non-parole period of 1 year and 6 months is imposed to date...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment