R v Paulson [2024] NSWDC 332
The offender's repeated domestic violence and related public justice offending against his former partner, committed in breach of apprehended domestic violence orders and while on parole, required a custodial aggregate sentence giving significant weight to specific and general deterrence, denunciation and protection of the victim and community. Although the detaining and intimidation offences were assessed below the mid-range or just below the mid-range, and the offender's guilty pleas, remorse, rehabilitation efforts and Bugmy factors were mitigating, those matters were outweighed by the seriousness of the offending, history of similar offending and guarded rehabilitation prospects....
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 01 May 2024
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Sentencing / Sentence After Guilty Pleas
- Outcome
- Aggregate sentence of 3 years and 6 months imprisonment with a non-parole period of 2 years and 3 months.
- Legal Topics
- ['domestic Violence' 'detain for Advantage' 'stalking or Intimidation' 'contravention of Apprehended Domestic Violence Order' 'attempt to Influence a Witness' 'aggravating Factors' 'mitigating Factors' 'bugmy Considerations' 'remorse and Rehabilitation']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Criminal Sentencing / Sentence After Guilty Pleas
Legal Issues
- 1 ['What sentence should be imposed for detaining a person with intention to obtain advantage contrary to s 86(1)(b) of the Crimes Act 1900 in a domestic violence context.' 'What sentence should be imposed for intimidation intending to cause fear of physical or mental harm contrary to s 13(1) of the Crimes (Domestic and Personal Violence) Act 2007.' 'What sentence should be imposed for repeated contraventions of apprehended domestic violence orders contrary to s 14(1) of the Crimes (Domestic and Personal Violence) Act 2007.' 'What sentence should be imposed for doing an act with the intention of influencing a witness to procure an acquittal contrary to s 323(a) of the Crimes Act 1900.' "How the offender's pleas of guilty, prior convictions, parole status, remorse, rehabilitation, Aboriginal background and deprived childhood should affect sentence." 'How totality and time already served, including time attributable to parole revocation and Local Court sentences, should affect commencement of the aggregate sentence.']
Ratio Decidendi
The offender's repeated domestic violence and related public justice offending against his former partner, committed in breach of apprehended domestic violence orders and while on parole, required a custodial aggregate sentence giving significant weight to specific and general deterrence, denunciation and protection of the victim and community. Although the detaining and intimidation offences were assessed below the mid-range or just below the mid-range, and the offender's guilty pleas, remorse, rehabilitation efforts and Bugmy factors were mitigating, those matters were outweighed by the seriousness of the offending, history of similar offending and guarded rehabilitation prospects....
Court Disposition
Aggregate sentence of 3 years and 6 months imprisonment with a non-parole period of 2 years and 3 months.
Orders
- ['The aggregate head sentence is 3 years and 6 months.' 'The non-parole period is 2 years and 3 months.' 'The sentence and non-parole period commence on 26 November 2022.' 'The offender will be eligible for release on 25 February 2025.' 'The additional term of 1 year and 3 months will expire on 25 May 2026.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment