CEO of Customs v Au [2005] NSWCA 119

CEO of Customs v Au [2005] NSWCA 119

The prior withdrawal and dismissal of charges in the Local Court was not a judicial determination on the merits and thus did not bar further proceedings by way of autrefois acquit, res judicata, or abuse of process; the appeal should be allowed and prior orders set aside.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
21 April 2005
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Judgment After Leave to Appeal, Appeal and Rehearing
Outcome
Appeal allowed; leave granted
Legal Topics
['double Jeopardy' 'autrefois Acquit' 'res Judicata' 'issue Estoppel' 'abuse of Process']
['criminal Law' 'procedure'] ['double Jeopardy' 'autrefois Acquit' 'res Judicata' 'issue Estoppel' 'abuse of Process']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Appeal / Judgment After Leave to Appeal, Appeal and Rehearing

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ['Whether the doctrine of autrefois acquit, res judicata, or abuse of process precluded the claimant from prosecuting allegations previously withdrawn and dismissed in Local Court' 'Whether Magistrate Stapleton had power to order dismissal of informations under Justices Act 1902 s 80']

Ratio Decidendi

The prior withdrawal and dismissal of charges in the Local Court was not a judicial determination on the merits and thus did not bar further proceedings by way of autrefois acquit, res judicata, or abuse of process; the appeal should be allowed and prior orders set aside.

Court Disposition

Appeal allowed; leave granted

Orders

  • ['Leave to appeal granted' 'Appeal allowed' 'Orders made by Shaw J on 16 and 17 September 2004 set aside' 'Judgment for claimant on the separate issue in paragraph 2 of Reply dated 3 October 2003' "Claimant's Notice of Motion filed on 9 October 2003 for leave to amend Statement of Claim dismissed" "Opponent to pay...