Smith v Marshall [1907] HCA 33
The right of dower was extinguished in New South Wales as a result of successive legislative reforms culminating in the Wills, Probate and Administration Act 1898, which, by express provision and necessary implication, abolished dower from intestate and testate estates and thereby destroyed its foundation, making the repeal of the Dower Act in 1901 a matter of legislative tidying, not revival of the common law right. Therefore, the repeal of the earlier statute did not revive the right of dower in lands alienated during the husband's lifetime.
- Parties
- Appellants; Defendants: Marshall and Others; Respondent; Plaintiff: Smith
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 13 August 1907
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / On Appeal From the Supreme Court of New South Wales; Appeal From a Decision of Walker J. on a Vendor and Purchaser Summons
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed with costs
- Legal Topics
- Dower, Consolidation of Statutes, Repeal and Revival of Common Law, Conveyancing, Succession, Wills and Probate
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Marshall and Others
Appellants; Defendants
Smith
Respondent; Plaintiff
Procedural Posture
Appeal / On Appeal From the Supreme Court of New South Wales; Appeal From a Decision of Walker J. on a Vendor and Purchaser Summons
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether repeal of the Act 7 Wm. IV., No. 8 revives the common law right of dower in New South Wales
- 2 Whether subsequent consolidating or repealing statutes revived or extinguished the right of dower in land alienated inter vivos by the husband
Ratio Decidendi
The right of dower was extinguished in New South Wales as a result of successive legislative reforms culminating in the Wills, Probate and Administration Act 1898, which, by express provision and necessary implication, abolished dower from intestate and testate estates and thereby destroyed its foundation, making the repeal of the Dower Act in 1901 a matter of legislative tidying, not revival of the common law right. Therefore, the repeal of the earlier statute did not revive the right of dower in lands alienated during the husband's lifetime.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed with costs
Orders
- Declarations granted that the respective wives of J. E. Holdsworth, L. J. Holdsworth, and the plaintiff were not entitled to dower in the property; vendor’s title was good.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment