Minister for Public Works (NSW) v Peisley [1922] HCA 53
Where a drainage trust imposes a rate and a Police Magistrate on appeal reduces or annuls rates for some occupiers, the Magistrate must, under sec. 55(4) of the Water Act 1912 (N.S.W.), increase rates for other occupiers so the total sum fixed by the trustees is not reduced.
- Parties
- Applicant, Appellant: The Minister for Public Works for New South Wales; Respondents: Peisley and others
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 14 December 1922
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / High Court of Australia; on Appeal From the Supreme Court of New South Wales
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed; order appealed from discharged; order nisi for mandamus made absolute.
- Legal Topics
- Drainage Trusts, Apportionment of Rates, Police Magistrate's Jurisdiction, Mandamus, Interpretation of Water Act 1912 (n.s.w.)
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
The Minister for Public Works for New South Wales
Applicant, Appellant
Peisley and others
Respondents
Procedural Posture
Appeal / High Court of Australia; on Appeal From the Supreme Court of New South Wales
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether under sec. 55(4) of the Water Act 1912 (N.S.W.), the Police Magistrate is required to apportion the amount by which he reduces or annuls rates among other occupiers so that the total sum required by the trust is not diminished.
Ratio Decidendi
Where a drainage trust imposes a rate and a Police Magistrate on appeal reduces or annuls rates for some occupiers, the Magistrate must, under sec. 55(4) of the Water Act 1912 (N.S.W.), increase rates for other occupiers so the total sum fixed by the trustees is not reduced.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed; order appealed from discharged; order nisi for mandamus made absolute.
Orders
- Order discharged from Supreme Court below.
- Mandamus to the Police Magistrate to increase the rates on occupiers other than those whose rates were reduced, so that the total sum is not diminished.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment