R v Chandler [1999] NSWDRGC 6
The accused is ineligible for sentence under Drug Court Act 1998 (NSW) s7(2) because the charged offences involve violent conduct (being actual use of force as required by statute and as previously defined in authority), although the accused does appear to be dependent on the use of prohibited drugs within s5(1)(d) of the Act.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 16 June 1999
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal / Preliminary Eligibility Hearing for Drug Court Sentence Referral
- Outcome
- Application dismissed; the accused is ineligible for Drug Court sentencing due to violent conduct exclusion.
- Legal Topics
- ['drug Court Act 1998 (nsw)' 'eligibility for Drug Court Program' 'dependence on Prohibited Drugs' 'violent Conduct Exclusion']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Criminal / Preliminary Eligibility Hearing for Drug Court Sentence Referral
Legal Issues
- 1 ["Whether the accused is an 'eligible person' under the Drug Court Act 1998 (NSW) s5(1)" "Whether the accused 'appears to be dependent on prohibited drugs'" 'Whether the offence involves violent conduct under s5(2)(b) of the Drug Court Act 1998 (NSW)']
Ratio Decidendi
The accused is ineligible for sentence under Drug Court Act 1998 (NSW) s7(2) because the charged offences involve violent conduct (being actual use of force as required by statute and as previously defined in authority), although the accused does appear to be dependent on the use of prohibited drugs within s5(1)(d) of the Act.
Court Disposition
Application dismissed; the accused is ineligible for Drug Court sentencing due to violent conduct exclusion.
Orders
- []
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment