R v Austen [2017] NSWDC 425
The offender supplied cocaine in bulk, facilitating another to become a dealer, with objective criminality greater than comparable cases. The total quantity was significantly above the indictable threshold and purity levels were high. Special circumstances justified breaking the statutory ratio between head sentence and non-parole period. Full-time custodial sentence is imposed as no penalty other than imprisonment is appropriate.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 25 August 2017
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal / Sentence
- Outcome
- Conviction and custodial sentence imposed.
- Legal Topics
- ['drug Supply' 'sentencing' 'special Circumstances']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Criminal / Sentence
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Sentencing for supply of cocaine' 'Determination of objective criminality' 'Appropriate sentence considering special circumstances']
Ratio Decidendi
The offender supplied cocaine in bulk, facilitating another to become a dealer, with objective criminality greater than comparable cases. The total quantity was significantly above the indictable threshold and purity levels were high. Special circumstances justified breaking the statutory ratio between head sentence and non-parole period. Full-time custodial sentence is imposed as no penalty other than imprisonment is appropriate.
Court Disposition
Conviction and custodial sentence imposed.
Orders
- ['Imprisonment for two years and three months, with a non-parole period of one year and three months commencing 27 July 2017 and expiring 26 October 2018.' 'Parole released at expiration of the non-parole period.' 'Further period of imprisonment of one year commencing after non-parole period and expiring 26 October...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment