R v Murray [2019] NSWDC 687
Given the offender's prior good character, compelling personal circumstances, responsibilities, and the negative effects a conviction would have on her ability to work and care for her children, it is expedient to not record a conviction and instead make a conditional release order under s 10(1)(b) of the Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 22 March 2019
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal / Sentencing
- Outcome
- Conditional release order for 16 months, conviction not recorded
- Legal Topics
- ['drug Offences' 'sentencing' 'conditional Release Order' 'conviction Not Recorded']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Criminal / Sentencing
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether a conviction should be recorded for supply of prohibited drug' 'Appropriate sentence for deemed supply of methylamphetamine']
Ratio Decidendi
Given the offender's prior good character, compelling personal circumstances, responsibilities, and the negative effects a conviction would have on her ability to work and care for her children, it is expedient to not record a conviction and instead make a conditional release order under s 10(1)(b) of the Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999.
Court Disposition
Conditional release order for 16 months, conviction not recorded
Orders
- ['The offender be released on a conditional release order for 16 months with conditions: not to commit any offence, to appear before the Court if called upon, to participate in any rehabilitation or treatment program directed by Community Corrections, and to abstain from drugs.' 'The offender to report to the...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment