R v Cao [2019] NSWDC 350
Given the principal offender's substantial involvement in cultivating significant quantities of cannabis by enhanced indoor means in two separate enterprises, with physical evidence linking him to both operations and in the absence of sufficient mitigating evidence regarding the purpose of his conduct, and in applying appropriate discounts for guilty pleas and considering his role in comparison with co-offenders, an aggregate sentence of 4 years' imprisonment with a non-parole period of 2 years and 6 months is appropriate.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 09 July 2019
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal / Sentence
- Outcome
- Aggregate sentence of imprisonment of 4 years with a non-parole period of 2 years 6 months
- Legal Topics
- ['drug Offences' 'cultivate Prohibited Plant' 'sentencing' 'imprisonment' 'aggregate Sentences' 'co Offenders' 'parole']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Criminal / Sentence
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Appropriate sentence for two counts of cultivating prohibited plants not less than commercial quantity' 'Consideration of discounts for guilty plea' 'Parity with co-offenders' "Assessment of the offender's role and culpability"]
Ratio Decidendi
Given the principal offender's substantial involvement in cultivating significant quantities of cannabis by enhanced indoor means in two separate enterprises, with physical evidence linking him to both operations and in the absence of sufficient mitigating evidence regarding the purpose of his conduct, and in applying appropriate discounts for guilty pleas and considering his role in comparison with co-offenders, an aggregate sentence of 4 years' imprisonment with a non-parole period of 2 years and 6 months is appropriate.
Court Disposition
Aggregate sentence of imprisonment of 4 years with a non-parole period of 2 years 6 months
Orders
- ['Conviction of both offences' 'Aggregate sentence of imprisonment for 4 years commencing 24 April 2018' 'Non-parole period of 2 years and 6 months expiring 23 October 2020' 'Sentence expiry on 23 April 2022']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment