R v Fostis COSTI [2012] NSWDC 288
An aggregate sentence of 4 years imprisonment with a non-parole period of 2 years was imposed for ongoing supply of heroin offences under s 25A(1), taking into account associated offences, with special circumstances for a reduced parole ratio, reflecting the offender's early guilty plea, personal progress in custody, and family support.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 03 December 2012
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal / Sentencing
- Outcome
- Conviction and aggregate custodial sentence imposed
- Legal Topics
- ['drug Offences' 'sentencing' 'supplying Prohibited Drugs' 'aggregate Sentence' 'non Parole Period']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Criminal / Sentencing
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Sentencing for supplying prohibited drugs (heroin) on an ongoing basis for financial gain' 'Taking into account associated offences' 'Fixing an aggregate sentence and non-parole period' 'Personal circumstances and criminal history impact on sentence']
Ratio Decidendi
An aggregate sentence of 4 years imprisonment with a non-parole period of 2 years was imposed for ongoing supply of heroin offences under s 25A(1), taking into account associated offences, with special circumstances for a reduced parole ratio, reflecting the offender's early guilty plea, personal progress in custody, and family support.
Court Disposition
Conviction and aggregate custodial sentence imposed
Orders
- ['Aggregate sentence of 4 years imprisonment with non-parole period of 2 years, commencing 23 August 2011' 'Non-parole period expires 22 August 2013; sentence expires 22 August 2015' 'Two backup offences (supply prohibited drug and possession of methylamphetamine) dismissed' 'Order for destruction of seized drugs...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment