R v Jessop [2023] NSWDC 367
Custodial punishment was warranted because the offender knowingly manufactured and supplied prohibited drugs and possessed prohibited weapons in circumstances requiring denunciation, general deterrence and community protection. Taking account of the pleas of guilty, totality, objective seriousness, Form 1 and s 166 matters, and the offender's trauma, treatment, demonstrated rehabilitation, abstinence from illicit drugs and reduced future risk, the appropriate disposition was an aggregate sentence of imprisonment to be served by Intensive Correction Order in the community.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 16 March 2023
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Sentencing / Committal for Sentence After Pleas of Guilty
- Outcome
- Aggregate sentence of 2 years and 10 months imprisonment commencing 16 March 2023 and expiring 15 January 2026, to be served by way of an Intensive Correction Order; Community Corrections Order for Sequence 8 for 12 months; remaining matter withdrawn and dismissed.
- Legal Topics
- ['drug Offences' 'manufacture Prohibited Drug' 'supply Prohibited Drug' 'cultivate Prohibited Plant' 'possess Prohibited Weapon' 'form 1 Offences' 'intensive Correction Orders' 'plea of Guilty' 'objective Seriousness' 'subjective Mitigation' 'trauma and Neglect']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Criminal Sentencing / Committal for Sentence After Pleas of Guilty
Legal Issues
- 1 ['What sentences should be imposed for multiple drug, weapons, prescribed restricted substance and suspected proceeds offences.' 'How Form 1 matters and s 166 Criminal Procedure Act 1986 (NSW) certificate matters should be taken into account on sentence.' "Whether the offender's background of trauma, neglect, mental health issues, drug use and rehabilitation mitigated sentence." 'Whether custodial sentences were required and, if so, whether the aggregate sentence should be served by way of an Intensive Correction Order.']
Ratio Decidendi
Custodial punishment was warranted because the offender knowingly manufactured and supplied prohibited drugs and possessed prohibited weapons in circumstances requiring denunciation, general deterrence and community protection. Taking account of the pleas of guilty, totality, objective seriousness, Form 1 and s 166 matters, and the offender's trauma, treatment, demonstrated rehabilitation, abstinence from illicit drugs and reduced future risk, the appropriate disposition was an aggregate sentence of imprisonment to be served by Intensive Correction Order in the community.
Court Disposition
Aggregate sentence of 2 years and 10 months imprisonment commencing 16 March 2023 and expiring 15 January 2026, to be served by way of an Intensive Correction Order; Community Corrections Order for Sequence 8 for 12 months; remaining matter withdrawn and dismissed.
Orders
- ['Convictions entered in each matter.' 'Sequence 8 on the s 166 certificate was not part of the aggregate sentence and was dealt with by a Community Corrections Order for 12 months from 16 March 2023.' 'For Sequence 7, manufacture of 4.8 grams of MDMA plus Form 1 matters, an indicative sentence of 2 years and 3...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment