R v Moore [2018] NSWDC 365
Given the defendant's early guilty plea, age, health, and need for supervision on parole, an aggregate term of imprisonment of four years with a non-parole period of two years is appropriate for the offences of supply of a prohibited drug and dealing with proceeds of crime; the possess cocaine offence is dealt with by conviction only under s 10A.
- Parties
- Prosecution: The Crown; Offender: Ricky Glen Moore
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 25 October 2018
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal / Sentencing
- Outcome
- Convicted and sentenced.
- Legal Topics
- Drug Supply, Dealing With Proceeds of Crime, Possession of Prohibited Drug, Sentencing
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
The Crown
Prosecution
Ricky Glen Moore
Offender
Procedural Posture
Criminal / Sentencing
Legal Issues
- 1 Appropriate sentence for supply of methylamphetamine
- 2 Sentence for dealing with property suspected to be proceeds of crime
- 3 Sentence for possession of cocaine
Ratio Decidendi
Given the defendant's early guilty plea, age, health, and need for supervision on parole, an aggregate term of imprisonment of four years with a non-parole period of two years is appropriate for the offences of supply of a prohibited drug and dealing with proceeds of crime; the possess cocaine offence is dealt with by conviction only under s 10A.
Court Disposition
Convicted and sentenced.
Orders
- For possess prohibited drug (cocaine): convicted under s 10A Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act, no further penalty.
- For supply prohibited drugs and deal with the proceeds of crime: aggregate term of imprisonment of 4 years, non-parole period of 2 years, commencing 1 April 2017.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment