Bradford Insulation Industries Pty Ltd & Anor v Babcock Australia Pty Ltd & Ors [2011] NSWCA 117
Division 6 of Part 4 of the Dust Diseases Tribunal Regulation 2007, as supported by the statutory definitions and regulation-making powers in the Dust Diseases Tribunal Act, applies a modified Claims Resolution Process to contribution claims brought in separate proceedings after the conclusion of the plaintiff's claim. The appeal to confine CRP to only cross-claims in original proceedings fails.
- Parties
- First Appellant: Bradford Insulation Industries Pty Limited; Second Appellant: CSR Limited; First Respondent: Babcock Australia Pty Limited; Second Respondent: Amaca Pty Limited (ACN 000 035 512) (Under NSW Administered Winding Up); Third Respondent: Wallaby Grip Limited; Fourth Respondent: Wallaby Grip (BAE) Pty Limited (in liquidation)
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 16 May 2011
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Leave to Appeal and Appeal Determined
- Outcome
- Leave to appeal granted; appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Dust Diseases Tribunal Procedure, Contribution Claims, Claims Resolution Process (crp), Apportionment of Liability
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Bradford Insulation Industries Pty Limited
First Appellant
CSR Limited
Second Appellant
Babcock Australia Pty Limited
First Respondent
Amaca Pty Limited (ACN 000 035 512) (Under NSW Administered Winding Up)
Second Respondent
Wallaby Grip Limited
Third Respondent
Wallaby Grip (BAE) Pty Limited (in liquidation)
Fourth Respondent
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Leave to Appeal and Appeal Determined
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Claims Resolution Process (CRP) applies to contribution claims made in separate proceedings after the original claim is finalised
- 2 Whether s 32H(1)(a) or s 32H(1)(b) of the Dust Diseases Tribunal Act authorises regulations applying the CRP in separate contribution proceedings
Ratio Decidendi
Division 6 of Part 4 of the Dust Diseases Tribunal Regulation 2007, as supported by the statutory definitions and regulation-making powers in the Dust Diseases Tribunal Act, applies a modified Claims Resolution Process to contribution claims brought in separate proceedings after the conclusion of the plaintiff's claim. The appeal to confine CRP to only cross-claims in original proceedings fails.
Court Disposition
Leave to appeal granted; appeal dismissed
Orders
- Leave to appeal is granted.
- Appeal is dismissed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment