Sydney Water Corporation v Marrickville Council [2014] NSWCA 438
Neither the appeal nor the cross-appeal raised a question of law, but rather contested the factual and methodological approach to valuation and compensation; no error of law was disclosed, and the trial judge's transparent and rational methodology was permissible within the statutory framework.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 19 December 2014
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal and Cross Appeal / Court of Appeal Decision
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed; cross-appeal dismissed; no order as to costs, each party to bear its own costs.
- Legal Topics
- ['easement Acquisition' 'determination of Compensation' 'comparable Sales Methodology' 'adjustment to Sales Valuation' 'error of Law in Compensation Calculations']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Appeal and Cross Appeal / Court of Appeal Decision
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether there was an error of law in determining comparable sales' 'Whether there was an error of law in making adjustments to comparable sales' 'Appropriate valuation methodology for land subject to easements' 'Whether the application of valuation principles disclosed an error of law']
Ratio Decidendi
Neither the appeal nor the cross-appeal raised a question of law, but rather contested the factual and methodological approach to valuation and compensation; no error of law was disclosed, and the trial judge's transparent and rational methodology was permissible within the statutory framework.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed; cross-appeal dismissed; no order as to costs, each party to bear its own costs.
Orders
- ['Appeal dismissed.' 'Cross-appeal dismissed.' 'No order as to costs, each party to bear its own costs of appeal and cross-appeal.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment