Gordon and Anor v Lever [2019] NSWSC 571
The Court found that the Defendants' conduct did not amount to unreasonable or unfair litigation behaviour sufficient to displace the general rule under s 88K(5), thus ordering the Plaintiffs to pay the Defendants’ costs on an ordinary basis for both sets of proceedings.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 17 May 2019
- Procedural Posture
- Costs Application Following Judgment Under S 88 K of Conveyancing Act 1919 (nsw) / Post Trial Costs Determination
- Outcome
- Plaintiffs to pay Defendants’ costs on an ordinary basis for both sets of proceedings.
- Legal Topics
- ['easements' 'costs Assessment' 'discretionary Costs Orders' 's 88 K of Conveyancing Act 1919 (nsw)']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Costs Application Following Judgment Under S 88 K of Conveyancing Act 1919 (nsw) / Post Trial Costs Determination
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the Plaintiffs should be ordered to pay the Defendants’ costs under s 88K(5) of the Conveyancing Act 1919 (NSW) or whether a contrary order is justified due to alleged unreasonable conduct by the Defendants']
Ratio Decidendi
The Court found that the Defendants' conduct did not amount to unreasonable or unfair litigation behaviour sufficient to displace the general rule under s 88K(5), thus ordering the Plaintiffs to pay the Defendants’ costs on an ordinary basis for both sets of proceedings.
Court Disposition
Plaintiffs to pay Defendants’ costs on an ordinary basis for both sets of proceedings.
Orders
- ["The Plaintiffs shall pay the Defendants' costs on an ordinary basis for both the 2017 and 2018 proceedings."]
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment