Campbell v Hamilton & Ors [2018] NSWSC 806
On the true construction of the 2016 Deed, read with its annexures and in light of the 2015 Heads and surrounding circumstances, the parties intended to grant an easement rather than a mere personal licence. The Schedule B dealing sufficiently identified the lower part of Lot 1153 intended to benefit from the easement when Annexures B and C were read together; the 3,649 square metre reference was a typographical or transcription error that could be disregarded, and the amendments made for registration gave effect to the rights promised by the 2016 Deed. The Hamiltons were entitled to the registered easement, had not acted unconscionably, and Mr Campbell was not entitled to cancellation...
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 04 June 2018
- Procedural Posture
- Equity Proceedings Concerning Validity and Construction of a Registered Easement and Related Cross Claim / Principal Judgment After Hearing
- Outcome
- Declarations made in favour of the first and second defendants/cross-claimants; the plaintiff's summons and statement of claim dismissed; plaintiff/cross-defendant to pay the defendants'/cross-claimants' costs subject to any special costs order application.
- Legal Topics
- ['easements' 'construction of Deed of Settlement' 'torrens Title Registration' 'conveyancing Act 1919 S 88 and S 88 K' 'real Property Act 1900 S 138' 'specific Performance' 'further Assurances' 'personal Equity or in Personam Right' 'costs']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Equity Proceedings Concerning Validity and Construction of a Registered Easement and Related Cross Claim / Principal Judgment After Hearing
Legal Issues
- 1 ["Whether the 2015 Heads and the 2016 Deed granted an easement over Mr Campbell's land or only conferred personal rights of access on the Hamiltons." 'Whether the Schedule B dealing clearly indicated the dominant tenement sufficiently for the purposes of Conveyancing Act 1919, s 88.' 'Whether amendments made before registration of the Transfer Granting Easement were authorised by, and gave effect to, the 2016 Deed.' 'Whether the registered easement AM160015N should be cancelled under Real Property Act 1900, s 138.' 'Whether the 2016 Deed binds successors in title and whether the registered easement is valid and enforceable.']
Ratio Decidendi
On the true construction of the 2016 Deed, read with its annexures and in light of the 2015 Heads and surrounding circumstances, the parties intended to grant an easement rather than a mere personal licence. The Schedule B dealing sufficiently identified the lower part of Lot 1153 intended to benefit from the easement when Annexures B and C were read together; the 3,649 square metre reference was a typographical or transcription error that could be disregarded, and the amendments made for registration gave effect to the rights promised by the 2016 Deed. The Hamiltons were entitled to the registered easement, had not acted unconscionably, and Mr Campbell was not entitled to cancellation...
Court Disposition
Declarations made in favour of the first and second defendants/cross-claimants; the plaintiff's summons and statement of claim dismissed; plaintiff/cross-defendant to pay the defendants'/cross-claimants' costs subject to any special costs order application.
Orders
- ['Declare that the Deed of Settlement and Release made between the plaintiff and the defendants and dated 14 November 2016, on its true construction, transfers the rights as set out in the Transfer Granting Easement registered number AM160015.' 'Declare that on its true construction the 2016 Deed binds successors in...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment