Clough v Breen (No. 4) [2023] NSWSC 1155
The rights conferred under Easement A (and comparable easements) entitle the dominant tenement owner to enter the servient tenement outside the defined easement site, but only where and to the extent that such entry is 'reasonably necessary' for the exercise of the easement right, considering the physical topography and functional requirements; conduct by either party that substantially interferes with the other's access or enjoyment under the easements, or involves excessive use beyond what is reasonably necessary, constitutes actionable nuisance or trespass; several incidents involved such excessive use, while others did not rise to actionable interference.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 22 September 2023
- Procedural Posture
- Equity/principal Judgment / Final Judgment With Further Issues Reserved
- Outcome
- Declarations made regarding construction of easements; interim regime continued; injunctions and damages issues left for further submissions.
- Legal Topics
- ['easements' 'nuisance' 'trespass' 'easement for Services' 'right of Access' 'construction of Easement Instruments']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Equity/principal Judgment / Final Judgment With Further Issues Reserved
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether conduct of parties amounted to substantial interference with rights under easements or trespass upon servient tenement' 'Whether the use of the inclinator by the dominant tenement owners amounted to excessive use and trespass or nuisance' 'Proper construction of Easement A under the s 88B instrument—scope of access for Lot 118 owner to Lot 116' 'Whether Lot 118 owner may enter Lot 116 outside site of easement in certain circumstances' 'Whether court is precluded by estoppel or res judicata in light of earlier judgments']
Ratio Decidendi
The rights conferred under Easement A (and comparable easements) entitle the dominant tenement owner to enter the servient tenement outside the defined easement site, but only where and to the extent that such entry is 'reasonably necessary' for the exercise of the easement right, considering the physical topography and functional requirements; conduct by either party that substantially interferes with the other's access or enjoyment under the easements, or involves excessive use beyond what is reasonably necessary, constitutes actionable nuisance or trespass; several incidents involved such excessive use, while others did not rise to actionable interference.
Court Disposition
Declarations made regarding construction of easements; interim regime continued; injunctions and damages issues left for further submissions.
Orders
- ['Declarations as to the scope of access rights for Lot 118 owner under Easement A, including permitted entry onto Lot 116 outside the corridor when reasonably necessary for access or repair.' 'Continuation of interim orders restraining certain uses pending further submissions.' 'Declarations and directions made...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment