Pasade Holdings Pty Ltd v Council of City of Sydney [2006] NSWSC 299
The conditions for granting an easement under section 88K Conveyancing Act 1919 were fulfilled: the easements are reasonably necessary for effective use and development of the land; they are not against the public interest; compensation is addressed by an undertaking in case the owner is later found; and all reasonable attempts to find the owner have failed. Therefore, the requested easements are granted.
- Parties
- Plaintiff/first Cross Defendant: Pasade Holdings Pty Limited; First Defendant/second Cross Defendant: Council of City of Sydney; Second Defendant/third Cross Defendant: Graham William Byrne; Third Defendant/fourth Cross Defendant: Peter Sydney Emery; Fourth Defendant/fifth Cross Defendant: Brian Bradley; Fifth Defendant/sixth Cross Defendant: The Owners of Strata Plan 61233; Seventh Cross Defendant: The Owners of Strata Plan 73850; Sixth Defendant/first Cross Claimant/applicant: John Anthony Arcidiacono; Seventh Defendant/second Cross Claimant/applicant: Anna Maria Arcidiacono
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 12 April 2006
- Procedural Posture
- Equity Proceedings—application for Grant of Easements / Judgment (ex Tempore) Granting Orders for Easements
- Outcome
- Easements granted
- Legal Topics
- Easements, Strata Subdivision, Section 88 K Orders
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Pasade Holdings Pty Limited
Plaintiff/first Cross Defendant
Council of City of Sydney
First Defendant/second Cross Defendant
Graham William Byrne
Second Defendant/third Cross Defendant
Peter Sydney Emery
Third Defendant/fourth Cross Defendant
Brian Bradley
Fourth Defendant/fifth Cross Defendant
The Owners of Strata Plan 61233
Fifth Defendant/sixth Cross Defendant
The Owners of Strata Plan 73850
Seventh Cross Defendant
John Anthony Arcidiacono
Sixth Defendant/first Cross Claimant/applicant
Anna Maria Arcidiacono
Seventh Defendant/second Cross Claimant/applicant
Procedural Posture
Equity Proceedings—application for Grant of Easements / Judgment (ex Tempore) Granting Orders for Easements
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the requirements for granting an easement under section 88K of the Conveyancing Act 1919 are satisfied
- 2 Whether easements over the laneways should be granted where the owner cannot be found
Ratio Decidendi
The conditions for granting an easement under section 88K Conveyancing Act 1919 were fulfilled: the easements are reasonably necessary for effective use and development of the land; they are not against the public interest; compensation is addressed by an undertaking in case the owner is later found; and all reasonable attempts to find the owner have failed. Therefore, the requested easements are granted.
Court Disposition
Easements granted
Orders
- Orders for granting the easements as sought; minor drafting matters to be attended to; Short Minutes to be brought in
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment