Scharer v State of New South Wales [2001] NSWCA 360
An easement deemed to be granted under s 153(3) of the National Parks and Wildlife Act is a right conferred by a planning or environmental law and thus within the exclusive jurisdiction of the Land and Environment Court under s 20(2)(a) and s 71 of the LEC Act. Claims for damages ancillary to such a right can also be heard in that Court. The Supreme Court has no discretion to retain the case where exclusive jurisdiction rests with the Land and Environment Court.
- Parties
- Claimant: Geoffrey Francis Scharer; Opponent: State of New South Wales
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 10 October 2001
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Judgment on Appeal From a Transfer Order (supreme Court Equity Division to Land and Environment Court)
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed with costs. Orders 1 and 3 of Santow J confirmed. Leave granted in order 2 of Santow J set aside.
- Legal Topics
- Easements, Rights of Way, Jurisdiction, Judicial Review, Declaratory Relief, Injunctions, Damages, Enforcement of Rights, Transfer of Proceedings
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Geoffrey Francis Scharer
Claimant
State of New South Wales
Opponent
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Judgment on Appeal From a Transfer Order (supreme Court Equity Division to Land and Environment Court)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the right of way (easement) claimed by the appellant is within the exclusive jurisdiction of the Land and Environment Court under the Land and Environment Court Act 1979;
- 2 Whether an easement or right of way deemed to be granted under s 153(3) of the National Parks and Wildlife Act 1974 is a right 'conferred or imposed by a planning or environmental law';
- 3 Whether the Land and Environment Court has jurisdiction to award damages in this context;
Ratio Decidendi
An easement deemed to be granted under s 153(3) of the National Parks and Wildlife Act is a right conferred by a planning or environmental law and thus within the exclusive jurisdiction of the Land and Environment Court under s 20(2)(a) and s 71 of the LEC Act. Claims for damages ancillary to such a right can also be heard in that Court. The Supreme Court has no discretion to retain the case where exclusive jurisdiction rests with the Land and Environment Court.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed with costs. Orders 1 and 3 of Santow J confirmed. Leave granted in order 2 of Santow J set aside.
Orders
- Appeal dismissed with costs;
- Orders 1 and 3 of Santow J confirmed;
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment