Australian Unity Retirement Living Management Pty Ltd v Karimbla Properties (No. 10) Pty Limited [2019] NSWSC 635
The court found the defendants' use of the shared driveway caused substantial interference with the plaintiffs' easement rights and excessive user of the defendants' own easement, by reason of frequent vehicle parking, loading/unloading, unsupervised pedestrians, and bin placement, to an extent that justified equitable and injunctive relief. However, the court also determined that equitable relief should be tailored on terms, accounting for the physical changes previously caused by the plaintiffs (Anglesea ramp and retaining wall) and the interrelationship between the parties' respective property and easement rights. Orders were granted to regulate driveway use (including signage,...
- Parties
- First Plaintiff: Australian Unity Retirement Living Management Pty Ltd; Second Plaintiff: Lifestyle Manor Bondi Pty Ltd; Third Plaintiff: Lifestyle Manor Anglesea Pty Ltd; Fourth Plaintiff: Australian Unity Aurora Pty Ltd; First Defendant: Karimbla Properties (No. 10) Pty Ltd; Second Defendant: Yeshiva College Bondi Limited; Third Defendant: Our Big Kitchen Pty Ltd; Fourth Defendant: Rabbi Dovid Slavin
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 31 May 2019
- Procedural Posture
- Civil / Final Judgment After Trial
- Outcome
- Relief granted; declaratory and injunctive orders made on terms as to regulation of driveway and easement use, with some issues reserved for further submissions.
- Legal Topics
- Easements, Substantial Interference, Excessive User, Nuisance, Rectification, Injunctions
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Australian Unity Retirement Living Management Pty Ltd
First Plaintiff
Lifestyle Manor Bondi Pty Ltd
Second Plaintiff
Lifestyle Manor Anglesea Pty Ltd
Third Plaintiff
Australian Unity Aurora Pty Ltd
Fourth Plaintiff
Karimbla Properties (No. 10) Pty Ltd
First Defendant
Yeshiva College Bondi Limited
Second Defendant
Our Big Kitchen Pty Ltd
Third Defendant
Rabbi Dovid Slavin
Fourth Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil / Final Judgment After Trial
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether defendants' use of shared driveway constituted substantial interference with the plaintiffs' easement rights and/or excessive user of the easement by the defendants; whether injunctive and ancillary relief should be granted; whether plaintiffs' own conduct (construction works, delay) should bar or condition relief; proper construction and application of easement terms in changed physical circumstances.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found the defendants' use of the shared driveway caused substantial interference with the plaintiffs' easement rights and excessive user of the defendants' own easement, by reason of frequent vehicle parking, loading/unloading, unsupervised pedestrians, and bin placement, to an extent that justified equitable and injunctive relief. However, the court also determined that equitable relief should be tailored on terms, accounting for the physical changes previously caused by the plaintiffs (Anglesea ramp and retaining wall) and the interrelationship between the parties' respective property and easement rights. Orders were granted to regulate driveway use (including signage,...
Court Disposition
Relief granted; declaratory and injunctive orders made on terms as to regulation of driveway and easement use, with some issues reserved for further submissions.
Orders
- Rectification of registered easement instrument to note variable width.
- Painted marking of easement boundaries to be corrected.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment