R v Buttigieg [2002] NSWDRGC 2
The mere existence of a breached bond for an offence involving violent conduct, not referred to the Drug Court under section 6, does not of itself render the applicant ineligible to enter the Drug Court program. Eligibility is determined with respect to the matters before the Drug Court, and unreferred charges or bonds may not impact eligibility. However, the Court retains discretion to refuse entry if outstanding matters would impede participation.
- Parties
- Prosecution: Regina; Offender: John Anthony Buttigieg
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 26 June 2002
- Procedural Posture
- Application for Entry to Drug Court Program / Eligibility Determination; Interlocutory Adjournment
- Outcome
- Matter adjourned for further consideration in light of findings.
- Legal Topics
- Eligibility for Drug Court Program, Offences Involving Violent Conduct, Interpretation of Drug Court Act 1998 (nsw)
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Regina
Prosecution
John Anthony Buttigieg
Offender
Procedural Posture
Application for Entry to Drug Court Program / Eligibility Determination; Interlocutory Adjournment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether a breached bond for an offence involving violent conduct renders the applicant ineligible for Drug Court program under section 5(2) of the Drug Court Act 1998 (NSW)
- 2 Whether the existence of outstanding charges or bonds before other courts affects eligibility for Drug Court programs
Ratio Decidendi
The mere existence of a breached bond for an offence involving violent conduct, not referred to the Drug Court under section 6, does not of itself render the applicant ineligible to enter the Drug Court program. Eligibility is determined with respect to the matters before the Drug Court, and unreferred charges or bonds may not impact eligibility. However, the Court retains discretion to refuse entry if outstanding matters would impede participation.
Court Disposition
Matter adjourned for further consideration in light of findings.
Orders
- Application adjourned to 23 July 2002 for further consideration.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment