Tooth and Co Ltd v Tillyer [1956] HCA 49
Section 64 (b) does not entitle an employer to indemnity from a worker's husband who negligently causes her injury because no legal liability to pay damages was created in the husband due to the bar on actions in tort between spouses; absent such a liability, the statutory condition for indemnity is not satisfied.
- Parties
- Applicant/plaintiff: Tooth and Company Limited; Respondent/defendant: Tillyer
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 22 August 1956
- Procedural Posture
- Application for Special Leave to Appeal / Application for Special Leave to Appeal From the Supreme Court of New South Wales
- Outcome
- Application for special leave refused
- Legal Topics
- Employers' Right of Indemnity Under Workers' Compensation Legislation, Tort Between Spouses, Statutory Interpretation of S. 64 Workers' Compensation Act (nsw)
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Tooth and Company Limited
Applicant/plaintiff
Tillyer
Respondent/defendant
Procedural Posture
Application for Special Leave to Appeal / Application for Special Leave to Appeal From the Supreme Court of New South Wales
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether s. 64 of the Workers' Compensation Act 1926-1954 (NSW) entitles an employer to indemnity from a worker's husband where compensation was paid for injuries resulting from the husband's negligence
- 2 Whether a husband is a 'person liable to pay damages' within the meaning of the section, given legal disability of one spouse to sue the other for tort
Ratio Decidendi
Section 64 (b) does not entitle an employer to indemnity from a worker's husband who negligently causes her injury because no legal liability to pay damages was created in the husband due to the bar on actions in tort between spouses; absent such a liability, the statutory condition for indemnity is not satisfied.
Court Disposition
Application for special leave refused
Orders
- Application for special leave to appeal is refused.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment