Alan Rowe, Employment Advocate v National Union of Workers [1999] FCA 857
The office constituted by Parliament is the Employment Advocate, and it is that office, not the temporary individual office holder, that is authorised to carry out the statutory functions and bring proceedings. The proceedings should always have been brought in the name of the Employment Advocate, so Mr Rowe's departure from office did not require the case to fail and the amendment should be granted.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 16 June 1999
- Procedural Posture
- Federal Court Proceedings Concerning the Employment Advocate Under the Workplace Relations Act / Application to Amend the Proceedings to Delete Alan Rowe's Name and Proceed in the Name of the Employment Advocate
- Outcome
- Amendment granted; respondents' objections rejected.
- Legal Topics
- ['employment Advocate' 'amendment of Proceedings' 'office Holder as Litigant' 'workplace Relations Act' 'freedom of Association Proceedings']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Federal Court Proceedings Concerning the Employment Advocate Under the Workplace Relations Act / Application to Amend the Proceedings to Delete Alan Rowe's Name and Proceed in the Name of the Employment Advocate
Legal Issues
- 1 ["Whether the proceedings could be amended to delete Alan Rowe's name and proceed in the name of the Employment Advocate." 'Whether proceedings brought by an official office should be constituted in the name of the temporary office holder or the office itself.' "Whether Mr Rowe's cessation as Employment Advocate meant the proceedings must fail or could not be carried on."]
Ratio Decidendi
The office constituted by Parliament is the Employment Advocate, and it is that office, not the temporary individual office holder, that is authorised to carry out the statutory functions and bring proceedings. The proceedings should always have been brought in the name of the Employment Advocate, so Mr Rowe's departure from office did not require the case to fail and the amendment should be granted.
Court Disposition
Amendment granted; respondents' objections rejected.
Orders
- ['The amendment deleting the name of Mr Rowe is granted.' 'The proceedings will henceforth be constituted as the Employment Advocate against the respondents.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment