SKD [2018] NSWCATGD 38
The Tribunal was satisfied that SKD continues to have a disability but that all necessary decisions can be made informally by his sister and support network without the need for a guardianship order. The observed restrictive practice (being kept within line of sight) does not restrict SKD’s freedom and is part of care obligations, not requiring ongoing guardianship intervention. There was therefore no further need for a guardianship order and it should lapse.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 17 September 2018
- Procedural Posture
- Review of Guardianship Order / End of Term Statutory Review
- Outcome
- Order lapsed; no further guardianship order made.
- Legal Topics
- ['end of Term Review' 'restrictive Practices' 'appointment of Guardian']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Review of Guardianship Order / End of Term Statutory Review
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether SKD continues to require a guardianship order' 'Whether practice of keeping SKD within line of sight is a restrictive practice' 'Whether a further guardianship order should be made']
Ratio Decidendi
The Tribunal was satisfied that SKD continues to have a disability but that all necessary decisions can be made informally by his sister and support network without the need for a guardianship order. The observed restrictive practice (being kept within line of sight) does not restrict SKD’s freedom and is part of care obligations, not requiring ongoing guardianship intervention. There was therefore no further need for a guardianship order and it should lapse.
Court Disposition
Order lapsed; no further guardianship order made.
Orders
- ['The guardianship order concerning SKD made on 1 September 2016 is lapsed from 17 September 2018.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment